Jeff uses BookEnds for example, so I really ought to go back and look at this when I give BookEnds a proper workout. It involves a lot of moving parts but one doesn’t necessarily need all of it, depending on one’s specific requirements. But if you use this, you have to import PDFs into LiquidText - which is a manual process from your reference manager of choice.ĭr Jeff Taekman, who featured on MPU back on Episode 169 nearly 7 years ago, uses a range of tools and brings them together into an academic workflow - he wrote up his workflow in 2015 and recently updated it. For example, I have dabbled with LiquidText on iOS which is phenomenal for PDF annotation and bringing together ideas. I think you are spot on here, One challenge is that some of the best-in-class features are not always standards-compatible, so it’s not easy to pick the best app for each task and integrate them into a cohesive workflow. You may find that you can better deal with the annoyances when you can find an app that provides the best benefits on the things that you absolutely need to be robust, consistent, and intuitive. The best approach at the moment is to decide what matters most in the entire envelope of actions classed under “citation management”… Zotero is middling in this regard - it doesn’t obey standard keyboard shortcuts, and there are a lot of ‘nice to have’ UX features that were in Papers 2 eight years ago which it doesn’t have.Īnd much more… I did once write a list of features an ideal app would have, once I finish the PhD I’ll dig it out. Papers 2 was excellent about this, Papers 3 required switching panes completely and was much more clunky. incomplete metadata fields (very important in some fields - I had to give up on Papers 2 when I published some computing conference papers, because not all required citation fields were shown in the app even though they still existed!).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |